Godless by Pete Hautman
6/10
This is a book for kids in middle school.
J.R.R. Tolkein is probably the most well known fantasy writer of all time. And it is because of this book, The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings Trilogy. This book is something of a prequel to that series, but it is also an amazing stand alone. The tale of Bilbo Baggins, a modest hobbit enjoying his quiet peaceful life, who becomes caught up in a whirlwind quest as a "burglar," is one of the best told stories of epic fantasy that I have ever read. It is extremely accessible, the few characters are enjoyable, and the plot is straight-forward without being too simple. The book is not anything spectacular, but it is solid and very good the whole time. Tolkein does a marvelous job of writing a tale that all other fantasy must compare itself too. And this novel stands the test of time. 8.5/10
between anything from political parties, wealth, and creed, to internal philosophies, ethnicity, or education. Matter compilers make anything from mattresses and synthetic rice, to office buildings and antibiotics. The world is dominated by overwhelming billboards, mediaglyphs not letters, and books speak out loud instead of being read. Nanotech robots protect the skies from pollutants and violence to an extent that the poverty shown in the book is ahrdly recognizable to what we know. I will not go directly into the plot, because it is vague, intricate, and pretty unique. I really do not know if I would reccommend this book to anyone but staunch science fiction readers.
Stephen King's The Dark Tower: the Gunslinger held high expectations in my mind. I don't read too much horror but was looking forward to reading some good old scary stuff. I had heard that the Dark Tower series was Stephen King's best work. He even won some awards for the center section. However if this book was any indication, I think it was undeserved. I guess I came into it wrong because this is not a horror novel. I could hardly even call it a novel. Hardly anything happens. Sure, some stuff happens, but it's all totally disconnected, and barely relevant.
Most of Douglas Adams' the Restaurant at the End of the Universe follows his previous characters misadventures through the galaxy in the same way as Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. There is essentially no plot, and the book begins and ends with nothing resembling normal story structures. This book is something more of a stringing together of barely interconnected events. While that might have been a novel, and wholly interesting device in the previous book, its entertainment value wanes here. Perhaps I simply need to take a break, but it seems like I could pick almost any random chapter and read it as opposed to chronological order.
I have read Douglas Adams' masterpiece The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy before, but it always astounds me. It is wildly imaginative, odd, and wonderful. It's also just a ton of fun.
ust because the story is epic doesn't mean you need to have twenty characters that you hardly know at all. I need characters that I know. Half the time someone was mentioned and I forgot who it was, and I read this consistently. I couldn't remember who was on which side, and how people knew each other. I like complexity, and I realize this is the first book in the series, but it just seemed all the culmination led to nothing. My biggest problem would be the fact that though there might be three or four antagonists, the major one in this book wasn't revealed, destroyed or even mentioned until the second half of the book. And they were around for only a few pages, with little description. There's plenty of alluding to more sinister people coming, but will they also have very little description? I want to keep reading the series because there is so much tension and turmoil building. Erikson is fairly good at that. But I can't read ten more books like this to finally get to that conclusion. The players discussed in great length at the beginning weren't mentioned in the end, and I had a hard time not reading with great haste towards the end. I probably won't read any more of these books unless I'm feeling like I need a ten book saga into this world.
Ray Bradbury's classic Fahrenheit 451 is a vision. It tells of a future so devoted to censorship and keeping things inside, that suicides and betrayals are commonplace.
Neal Stephenson's Snow Crash is an excellent read. Stephenson's total immersion into a frighteningly near world of mob owned franchulates, samurai hackers, and hydrogen- bomb strapped baddies gears you up for some awesome action and surprising revelations in Snow Crash. 8/10
In the end of the first trilogoy Frank Herbert really brings back the things that made Dune great. I was skeptical about the whole series and his writing in general from Dune Messiah, but Children of Dune truly was great and made me want to read on again. However, I think three books from one author is enough for a time. I need to get back to reading a non-fiction anyway.
From the beginning Frank Herbert's Dune resonated with me. Within the first ten pages I thought it was one of the best books I had ever read. Filled with insight, philosophy, and mysticism Dune has much to offer the contemplative science-fiction reader. Though the book might be more aptly named "Arrakis Awakening," the title Dune shows all of Herbert's cunning in the bare necessity of a word to encapsulate the total essence of an idea. His style is direct and I was often caught by the penetrating truth of his profound simplicity within understanding.
to William Gibson's though.
I just finished Lolita by Vladamir Nabokov. Overall I would say I enjoyed and relished the book. Nabokov is an exquisite writer of human emotion and cognition.
living in a futuristic black market Japan. He's been crippled from interfacing with computers after stealing from his employers. Hackers in this future actually jack into the virtual 'matrix' of computer programs and realities to exploit walls of information there. Case is recruited by Artimage, an ex-militant, and Molly, a genetically-modified street samurai, for a complex heist involving viruses, conspiracy, drugs, cryogenic families, clones, and artificial intelligences.
It was the book that brought me from young adult reading for pleasure and wonder, to books of substance and meaning. Though Magician is not the greatest in those qualities, it showed me what a book could be involving well written cultural descriptions, dynamic characters, and a diverse and interwoven plot.
an imprisoned life becoming the most magically gifted boy of his generation. And I certainly would not shun it because of its popular appeal.
Though I'm sure there are more powerful books out there, few have timed their effect on me as strongly as this.
co-workers read these books, and everyone loves them. Orson Scott Card is simply an amazing writer of human thought, emotion, and the things that drive and compel us to be how we are.
there are only people living their lives and trying to do what is right for them. That is why this book resonates so much with me; it is an episode in the human condition with an amazing story as the backdrop for such trying interactions, insights, and emotions.